Q3 2021 Portfolio Update

Performance Overview

For Q3 2021, the portfolio is down 0.65%, and up 17.4% YTD. The Q1 starting balance was $144,722.98, and finished the quarter at $147,690.65. Contributions to the portfolio during the quarter amount to $3,948. 

A few new positions were added this quarter in several of the portfolio categories. On the discretionary side, British American Tobacco (BTI) was purchased. The Deep Value category saw the addition of M/I Homes (MHO). Finally, SLV silver ETF was added to the precious metals holdings. 

The current allocation of the portfolio is shown in the chart below. Currently, the portfolio  consists of discretionary value stocks, oil tankers, deep value, 401k stocks, precious metals, and cash. It can be seen that 72.1% of the portfolio is in stocks, while 27.9% is in cash and safe haven assets.

During the quarter I received $231.90 total in dividends, which is broken down in the table below.

TickerQuarterly Dividend 
FE48.75
DHT4.30
ITIC5.52
EMR42.93
COF66.00
SPG64.40
Total231.90

Discretionary Summary

Discretionary value is the label I’m giving to the positions that are fairly large (~5% of the portfolio) I believe are undervalued and may have the following characteristics: quality business, competitive advantage, misunderstood by the market, or a good company in a heavily sold off industry. The current discretionary value stocks I own consist of Capital One Financial (COF), Emerson Electric (EMR), Simon Property Group (SPG), FirstEnergy (FE), British American Tobacco (BTI). The table below shows the cost basis, current value, and gains/losses for these positions. 

The newest addition to the discretionary portfolio was the purchase of British American Tobacco. Cigarette volumes have been declining at a rate of 5% annually, and that trend is expected to continue. BTI is preparing for a “post-cigarette” world by developing alternative tobacco products that they claim is much more safe than combustables. While ESG funds are not allowed to own British American Tobacco, I don’t mind BTI’s 8% dividend yield.

Capital One recently announced they will enter the Buy-Now-Pay-Later (BNPL) space to compete with companies like Affirm. BNPL seems like a crowded space, so it will be interesting to see if COF can make an impact. With this announcement, it looks like I will be doing some homework on the competition..

First Energy announced their settlement with the DOJ concerning their bribery scandal. The company will pay $115 million to the US Treasury, and another $115 million to Ohio utility customers. These payments will be spread out over three years. With this scandal receding into the background, hopefully FE can revert to their pre-scandal price. 

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
COF63.253,478.758,507.95144.57%
EMR41.003,485.008,180.40134.73%
SPG74.503,427.006,002.0875.14%
FE28.003,500.004,651.2532.89%
BTI37.457,114.916,703.20(5.78%)

Tanker Stocks

Tankers have slightly improved this quarter, but are still a sore point in my portfolio. I wouldn’t be opposed to selling these stocks. However, I don’t have any better ideas, I already have a large cash position, and there is some hope they will work out in the medium term.

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
DHT8.171,755.901,395.35-20.53%
FRO10.661,738.291,467.00-15.60%
STNG26.631,742.671,499.40-13.96%
TNK23.861,765.881,067.08-39.57%

Deep Value

Deep value is a sub-strategy I’m employing in my portfolio. This is a quantitative strategy that buys a basket of statistically cheap stocks. The metric I use is EV/EBIT, based on the wonderful book The Acquirers Multiple. Historically, this strategy has provided excellent returns, although it has not kept up with the S&P 500 the past few years. Additionally, I am making an effort to apply this strategy to microcap companies. Microcaps are classified as having a market capitalization between $50M-300M. These small companies are more volatile, but have the potential for attractive returns.

My position sizing is smaller than the discretionary side of my portfolio because I want to own a basket of about 20 stocks. Since this is a quantitative strategy, I do not spend much time analyzing these businesses. The main idea is that these companies are trading at very cheap valuations, and the winners will (hopefully) outnumber the losers. 

Note: MSGN merged with MSGE during the quarter

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
BIIB275.002,475.003,116.4325.91%
BTG5.252,499.002,003.96-19.81
HXL36.801,803.203,057.6069.56%
ITIC164.541,974.482,095.566.13%
MSGE16.002,000.001,822.50-8.88
QDEL120.002,520.002,690.526.77%
MHO60.002,520.002,427.60(3.67%)

RSKIA, FF, and BBSI were sold this quarter since I’ve held them for a year. RSKIA and BBSI realized attractive gains, while FF produced a loss. Last quarter Future Fuel paid out a special dividend, which I received about $300. With this special dividend, my return with FF was closer to breaking even. The new addition this quarter was the home builder M/I Homes (MHO).

Cost BasisSale ProceedsRealized Gain (Loss)
RSKIA1,740.752,690.2354.54%
FF1,794.001,310.99(26.92%)
BBSI1,767.502,572.4845.54%

401k and Precious Metals

My 401k is through my current employer and actively receives contributions. The 401k consists of a Blackrock Target Date Fund (which is no longer being funded), and the Oakmark Fund. The Oakmark Fund is a large cap value fund. Since I am actively contributing to my 401k, it will naturally have a growing influence on my portfolio. 

I also have a decent allocation to precious metals that are used as a bond substitute, recession and inflation hedge. This quarter, I added 100 units of iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at a cost basis of $20.52 a unit. The table below shows the YTD performance for the precious metals and 401k, which includes the effects of contributions.

12/31/209/30/21YTD Gain (Loss)YTD Contributions
Precious Metals9,964.009,682.04-6.84%2,054
401k32,252.4354,845.1821.91%14,200.00

Books I’m Reading

This quarter I read “Kochland: The Secret History of Koch Industries and Corporate Power in America”. Prior to reading the book, I was not too familiar with the Koch brothers besides them controlling the largest private company in the country, them being libertarians, and that they are controversial. This book covers the history of Koch Industries, Charles Koch’s management philosophy, various Koch Industry scandals, and Charles Koch’s lobbying machine. Kochland has a somewhat negative bias against Charles Koch, which I kind of knew before reading, so the negative portrayal did not bother me.

Much of the book consisted of explaining how Koch Industries went into a new line of business, then some crises happened in that new business, then presenting 1st hand accounts from key people navigating said crisis. This process repeated several times. The book did provide a good overview of the history of the company. I wish it provided more financial data, but apparently Koch Industries is extremely secretive so that info is not usually released.

The chapters on Charles Koch’s political network were very interesting. I was not aware of how impactful Koch’s lobbying groups were at amplifying the Tea Party movement, blocking climate legislation, and meddling with Trump’s tax plan. Overall the book was quite the page turner, I just might seek out other books on Koch Industries to get an additional perspective.

For more value investing fundamentals check out:

Q2 2021 Portfolio Update

Stock Analysis: Brown-Foreman

Book Review: Buffettology

Stock Analysis: Union Pacific

Q2 2021 Portfolio Update

Performance Overview

For Q2 2021, the portfolio is up 6.37%, and up 18% YTD. The Q2 starting balance was $132,799.55, and finished the quarter at $144,722.98. Contributions to the portfolio during the quarter amount to $3,386. 

A few new positions were added this quarter in the deep value category. These include Biogen, MSG Networks, Investors Title Co, Quidel, and B2Gold. Additionally, Richardson Electronics was sold for a gain. 

The current allocation of the portfolio is shown in the chart below. Currently, the portfolio  consists of discretionary value stocks, oil tankers, deep value, 401k stocks, precious metals, and cash. It can be seen that 72.1% of the portfolio is in stocks, while 27.9% is in cash and safe haven assets.

During the quarter I received $587.72 total in dividends, which is broken down in the table below. It should be noted that FutureFuel paid a special dividend in addition to their normal dividend, which amounted to $345.

TickerQuarterly Dividend 
FF353.28
STNG6.80
FE48.75
DHT8.60
BTG19.04
ITIC5.52
BBSI21.00
EMR42.93
COF22.00
SPG59.80
Total587.72

Discretionary Summary

Discretionary value is the label I’m giving to the positions that are fairly large (~5% of the portfolio) I believe are undervalued and may have the following characteristics: quality business, competitive advantage, misunderstood by the market, or a good company in a heavily sold off industry. The current discretionary value stocks I own consist of Capital One Financial (COF), Emerson Electric (EMR), Simon Property Group (SPG), and FirstEnergy (FE). The table below shows the cost basis, current value, and gains/losses for these positions. 

Recently, FirstEnergy announced a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ. This will probably result in a fine, and hopefully the scandal will be put to rest. The Fed released the results of their latest bank stress test. Capital One was one of the strongest performers in the stress test, meaning. COF has plenty of excess capital to weather a storm. Or since it appears things are returning to normal, hopefully Capital One can return some of this cash to shareholders.

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
COF63.253,478.758,507.95144.57%
EMR41.003,485.008,180.40134.73%
SPG74.503,427.006,002.0875.14%
FE28.003,500.004,651.2532.89%

Tanker Stocks

Tankers have slightly improved this quarter, but are still a sore point in my portfolio. I wouldn’t be opposed to selling these stocks. However, I don’t have any better ideas, I already have a large cash position, and there is some hope they will work out in the medium term.

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
DHT8.171,755.901,395.35-20.53%
FRO10.661,738.291,467.00-15.60%
STNG26.631,742.671,499.40-13.96%
TNK23.861,765.881,067.08-39.57%

Deep Value

Deep value is a sub-strategy I’m employing in my portfolio. This is a quantitative strategy that buys a basket of statistically cheap stocks. The metric I use is EV/EBIT, based on the wonderful book The Acquirers Multiple. Historically, this strategy has provided excellent returns, although it has not kept up with the S&P 500 the past few years. Additionally, I am making an effort to apply this strategy to microcap companies. Microcaps are classified as having a market capitalization between $50M-300M. These small companies are more volatile, but have the potential for attractive returns.

My position sizing is smaller than the discretionary side of my portfolio because I want to own a basket of about 20 stocks. Since this is a quantitative strategy, I do not spend much time analyzing these businesses. The main idea is that these companies are trading at very cheap valuations, and the winners will (hopefully) outnumber the losers. 

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
BIIB275.002,475.003,116.4325.91%
BTG5.252,499.002,003.96-19.81
FF13.001,794.001,324.80-26.15%
HXL36.801,803.203,057.6069.56%
ITIC164.541,974.482,095.566.13%
MSGN16.002,000.001,822.50-8.88
QDEL120.002,520.002,690.526.77%
RSKIA8.251,740.752,743.0057.57%

Since I sold some deep value stocks last quarter, I used the proceeds to buy a few new companies this quarter. The new additions are Biogen (BIIB), B2Gold (BTG), Investors Title Co (ITIC), MSG Networks (MSGN), and Quidel (QDEL). Some of the remaining deep value picks, such as FF and RKIA, are coming to their one year anniversary so they will probably be sold next quarter. Finally, Richardson Electronics was sold this quarter for a nice gain.

Cost BasisSale ProceedsRealized Gain (Loss)
RELL1,802.252,997.3266.31%

401k and Precious Metals

My 401k is through my current employer and actively receives contributions. The 401k consists of a Blackrock Target Date Fund (which is no longer being funded), and the Oakmark Fund. The Oakmark Fund is a large cap value fund. Since I am actively contributing to my 401k, it will naturally have a growing influence on my portfolio. 

I also have a decent allocation to precious metals that are used as a bond substitute, recession and inflation hedge. The table below shows the YTD performance for the precious metals and 401k, which includes the effects of contributions.

12/31/206/30/21YTD Gain (Loss)YTD Contributions
Precious Metals9,964.009,682.04-2.83%
401k32,252.4349,930.8419.68%10,252.00

Books I’m Reading

One of my recent reads was “The Go-Go Years: The Drama and Crashing Finale of Wall Street’s Bullish 60’s”. I was looking for a market history book that covered the 1960’s market boom, then the stagflation bear market of the 70’s. A part of me feels like history is repeating, so I was interested in learning more about this time period and I’ve heard this book mentioned before. Unfortunately, Go-Go Years does not cover the high inflation of the 1970’s. It is mostly focused on the 60’s and ends with the recession in 1970. Despite this, the book was still quite interesting because I was not aware of all the stock market drama going on in the 1960’s. 

The book starts off early in the decade, painting the picture of a market moved by individuals instead of institutions. Then the growth mutual funds pioneered by George Tsai, and copied by many, took advantage of the technology companies of the day. Conglomerates became a new phenomenon with Textron, Litton Industries, Gulf+Western and the like. Financial engineering and shoddy accounting was spreading throughout corporate America. Go-Go Years culminated with the 1970 recession that crushed the overleveraged stock brokerage industry. This era does not get mentioned as much as 1929 or 2008, but if you enjoy market history, Go-Go Years is a good read. 

The second book I read this quarter was the personal finance classic “The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America’s Wealthy”. I thought I knew the gist of the book, “live below your means and invest”, but Millionaire Next Door presented some interesting information that made it an enjoyable read. Many of the millionaires profiled in the book come from humble, or even poor beginnings, yet they build a small company, save, and invest. The example millionaires were frugal, but to my surprise, they didn’t drive 15 year old Honda Civics. The authors’ surveys found that many of the self made millionaires bought newer cars, they just bought Cadillac’s and Ford Explorers instead of high end BMW’s. A big theme of the book was that you can have a high income, but if you spend it all on status items you can look rich but actually have little net worth. Now whenever I think about making a big purchase, I’ll ask myself “What would a millionaire next door do?”.

For more value investing fundamentals check out:

2020 Portfolio Update

Stock Analysis: Brown-Foreman

Book Review: Buffettology

Stock Analysis: Union Pacific

Q1 2021 Portfolio Update

This post contains affiliate links. If you use these links to buy something I may earn a commission. Thanks for your support.

Performance Overview

For Q1 2021, the portfolio is up 11.09%. The Q1 starting balance was $113,027.88, and finished the quarter at $132,799.55. Contributions to the portfolio during the quarter amount to $6,866. 

No stocks were bought this quarter, however a few positions were sold. Paul Mueller Co, Friedman Industries, and Surge Components were all sold for a gain. 

The current allocation of the portfolio is shown in the chart below. Currently, the portfolio  consists of discretionary value stocks, oil tankers, deep value, 401k stocks, precious metals, and cash. It can be seen that 64.2% of the portfolio is in stocks, while 35.8% is in cash and safe haven assets.

During the quarter I received $230.67 total in dividends, which is broken down in the table below.

TickerQuarterly Dividend 
FF8.28
STNG6.80
FE48.75
DHT10.75
RELL24.30
FRD7.06
EMR42.93
COF22.00
SPG59.80
Total230.67

My Thoughts

I don’t have much thoughts this quarter, except to say that the r/wallstreetbets and GameStop ordeal is dumb.

Discretionary Summary

Discretionary value is the label I’m giving to the positions that are fairly large (~5% of the portfolio) I believe are undervalued and may have the following characteristics: quality business, competitive advantage, misunderstood by the market, or a good company in a heavily sold off industry. The current discretionary value stocks I own consist of Capital One Financial (COF), Emerson Electric (EMR), Simon Property Group (SPG), and FirstEnergy (FE). The table below shows the cost basis, current value, and gains/losses for these positions. 

The only bit of news with these stocks is that Emerson’s long time CEO David Farr retired, replaced by Lal Karsanbhai. A long tenured, quality CEO is a consideration when looking for quality companies. I will have to keep an eye on the new management to see how their capital allocation stacks up.

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
COF63.253,478.756,997.65101.15%
EMR41.003,485.007,668.70120.05%
SPG74.503,427.005,233.4252.71%
FE28.003,500.004,336.2523.89%

Tanker Stocks

Tankers have slightly improved this quarter, but are still a sore point in my portfolio. I wouldn’t be opposed to selling these stocks. However, I don’t have any better ideas, I already have a large cash position, and there is some hope they will work out in the medium term.

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
DHT8.171,755.901,274.95-27.39%
FRO10.661,738.291,165.45-32.95%
STNG26.631,742.671,255.28-38.82%
TNK23.861,765.881,028.6-41.75%

Deep Value

Deep value is a sub-strategy I’m employing in my portfolio. This a quantitative strategy that buys a basket of statistically cheap stocks. The metric I use is EV/EBIT, based on the wonderful book The Acquirers Multiple. Historically, this strategy has provided excellent returns, although it has not kept up with the S&P 500 the past few years. Additionally, I am making an effort to apply this strategy to microcap companies. Microcaps are classified as having a market capitalization between $50M-300M. These small companies are more volatile, but have the potential for attractive returns.

My position sizing is smaller than the discretionary side of my portfolio because I want to own a basket of about 20 stocks. Since this is a quantitative strategy, I do not spend much time analyzing these businesses. The main idea is that these companies are trading at very cheap valuations, and the winners will (hopefully) outnumber the losers. 

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
BBSI50.501,767.502,410.1036.34%
FF13.001,794.002,005.1411.77%
HXL36.801,803.202,744.0052.17%
RELL4.451,802.252,579.8543.14%
RSKIA8.251,740.752,795.7760.61%

This quarter I sold off three of these deep value positions. Paul Mueller Co was sold for a 102.5% gain, Friedman Industries for a 65.67% gain, and Surge Components for a 120.77% gain. With this quantitative strategy, I would typically hold the stocks for one year, then rebalance into a fresh set of undervalued stocks. I sold MUEL and SPRS early because they have run up massively lately. It would be expected that some of these microcaps will shoot up in price randomly. But over the past few months, it seems like all of these small deep value companies are rapidly rising. Maybe I’ll regret selling too early, but it seems hard to regret taking a 120% gain. As for FRD, it was a net-net when I bought it. The price reverted back to its net current asset value, so I made my exit.

Cost BasisSale ProceedsRealized Gain (Loss)
MUEL1,768.003,580.18102.5%
FRD1,800.102,982.1365.67%
SPRS1,819.304,016.47120.77%

401k and Precious Metals

My 401k is through my current employer and actively receives contributions. The 401k consists of a Blackrock Target Date Fund (which is no longer being funded), and the Oakmark Fund. The Oakmark Fund is a large cap value fund. Since I am actively contributing to my 401k, it will naturally have a growing influence on my portfolio. 

I also have a decent allocation to precious metals that are used as a bond substitute, recession and inflation hedge. The table below shows the YTD performance for the precious metals and 401k, which includes the effects of contributions.

12/31/203/31/21YTD Gain (Loss)YTD Contributions
Precious Metals9,964.009,281.20-6.85%
401k32,252.4343,020.2710.93%6,866.00

Books I’m Reading

The Outsiders: Eight Unconventional CEOs and Their Radically Rational Blueprint for Success was a book that I kept hearing people talk about, so I finally read it. The CEOs covered in this book include Warren Buffett, John Malone, Catherine Graham, Tom Murphy, Henry Singleton, Bill Anders, Bill Stiritz, and Dick Smith. Obviously I’m familiar with Buffett, and knew a little about some of these CEOs. However, it was nice to read about these capital allocators at General Dynamics, Ralston Purina, General Film, that I never heard of. The book emphasizes how these CEOs outperformed Jack Welch of GE, the poster boy of a successful CEO. Each of these CEOs focused on going against the herd, and expertly allocating capital instead of doing dumb acquisitions, or focusing on quarterly results. This book was a quick read, and very much enjoyable.

The second book I read this quarter was Skyscraper Dreams: The Great Real Estate Dynasties of New York. Dynasties is a good word to describe these New York real estate players since many of these are multi-generational family businesses, which I found fascinating. The book starts with Manhattan back when it was mostly fields, and progresses towards the early 1900’s where skyscrapers appear onto the scene. As the 20th century unfolds, you learn about the skyscraper boom leading up to the Depression, the post-war boom, the changing of the guard in the 1960’s, and New York’s financial woes in the 1970’s. I wasn’t too familiar with NYC history, let alone the stories of the people who built it. If you’re interested in a financial history book that’s a bit different than stock investing or business, I recommend this one.

For more value investing fundamentals check out:

2020 Portfolio Update

Stock Analysis: Brown-Foreman

Book Review: Buffettology

The Many Flavors of Value Investing

2020 Portfolio Update

Performance Overview

For Q4 2020, the portfolio is up 13.21% and finished the year up 23.47%. The Q4 starting balance was $96,383.61, and finished the quarter at $113,027.88. Contributions to the portfolio during the quarter amount to $3,656. 

No stocks were bought or sold during this quarter. During October and November I owned some SPY puts as tail hedges, but I let that position run off in December. 

The current allocation of the portfolio is shown in the chart below. Currently, the portfolio  consists of discretionary value stocks, oil tankers, deep value, 401k stocks, precious metals, and cash. It can be seen that 66.7% of the portfolio is in stocks, while 33.3% is in cash and safe haven assets. I would prefer to deploy more of the cash to undervalued stocks, but I am remaining cautious despite the market ripping higher towards the end of the year.

During the quarter I received $427.04 total in dividends, which is broken down in the table below.

TickerQuarterly Dividend 
FF8.28
BBSI10.50
FRO81.50
STNG6.80
FE48.75
DHT43.00
RELL24.30
FRD7.06
RSKIA88.62
EMR42.93
COF5.50
SPG59.80
Total427.04

My Thoughts

2020 in Review

Going into 2020, my portfolio was a mess. Once upon a time, I was going for a multi-asset strategy. My portfolio consisted of value stocks, emerging markets, commodities, precious metals, money market, and tail hedge puts. In mid-2019 I sold my value stocks to buy a house, which created a gaping hole in my portfolio that remained early in 2020. As the market started to react to COVID, I quickly tried to get my portfolio in order. The primary focus was to reorient my portfolio to mostly focus on value stocks, and taking advantage of the market selloff to buy some quality companies at a discount.

One of the key factors that shaped this year’s performance was holding about $500 in SPY put options. The idea is that they would provide a buffer so that the portfolio could break even even if the market dropped by 20%. In late February these options were doing their job, so I sold them at a value of about $9,000. In hindsight I should have held onto them into March, but I can’t complain. The rest of the portfolio was primarily cash, plus stocks from my current 401k, and some precious metals.

The proceeds of this hedging was used to buy the first batch of quality companies. In March, I bought Capital One, Emerson Electric, and Simon Property Group. To my surprise, the market panic didn’t last long, so the deals quickly dried up. 

During April and May I jumped onto the oil tanker trade. While the thesis played out, these companies made a ton of money, the stock returns have been abysmal. I probably bought these stocks at the peak, but that’s the way it goes. 

The summer months saw me dip my toe into buying deep value stocks. These are stocks that traded at less than 5 times enterprise value over EBIT. Most of the companies I bought were microcaps, which have a market capitalization of less than $300 million. I didn’t know it at the time, but my timing in buying these stocks was great. The deep value universe got slaughtered during the March selloff, down around 50%. During the summer these stocks turned the corner and rallied all year so that they ended the year down only 7%. 

In August I bought some First Energy hoping their bribery scandal is overblown. Finally during the fall I started up the tail hedging strategy again in case of worsening COVID, no stimulus getting passed, and election drama. All of those things happened, but the market ripped higher on vaccine news, causing me a small loss on my SPY puts.

It felt like there was a lot of action in 2020, however I also tried to be measured in my capital allocation. Most of the year I carried a large cash balance, waiting for another chance to buy some undervalued stocks. In hindsight I should have gone all in, but I’d rather act conservatively and survive as an investor.     

Luck vs Skill

While I am proud of my performance this year, I am trying to reflect on my decision making. Many of my decisions, and outcomes, were the result of some part skill. However, I am aware I had some lucky tailwinds as well. Since I can be jealous sometimes, I also look at other investors and wonder how much of their results were based on luck or skill. 

The way I see it, there is a spectrum of complete luck (roulette wheel) to skill (chess), and most things fall in the middle. Everything in investing probably has some degree of luck involved. But there is a difference between making sound, well thought out decisions, and speculating without even being able to provide a thesis besides “stocks only go up” or “it’s different this time”. It is probably impossible to quantify luck vs skill in investing, but I’m going to ramble on a bit anyways. 

I’m not sure if it was luck or skill that I was hedged in February. The outcome of this hedging dramatically impacted this year’s performance. 

I chalked it up more towards skill that I was buying in March when everyone was panic selling. On the flip side, if Great Depression 2.0 happened, I’d probably be complaining that I pulled the trigger too early. 

Perhaps I got on board with the oil tanker trade too late, my timing being bad luck, or maybe it was a lack of skill. 

The deep value universe was turning the corner right when I was buying in the summer. I’ll take this lucky timing since Paul Mueller Co, Barrett Business Solutions, Friedman Industries, and Spark Components have really helped me out. 

During the summer, Emerson was up 50%. It was tempting to sell it and get those quick gains. However I am trying to be more disciplined and hold my stocks longer, which worked out because now Emerson is up nearly 100%.

I think you can see there are arguments for luck and skill in many of my decisions. As I look around, I wonder about other investors (or speculators). Is betting on government stimulus, accommodative Federal Reserve, record vaccine development luck or skill? Is it luck or skill to buy cruise ships, airlines, Zoom, NIO and the like? Good for the people who made massive gains this year, but it would probably be wise to reflect on your decision making. 

One issue with the stock market is that many people focus on the short term. This short termism makes it easy to think the market is just a casino. Instead, I view owning stocks as owning a slice of a business. Holding a stock for the long term reduces the role of luck since the returns are more driven by business economics. I believe having a long time horizon, and taking advantage of behavioral psychology, allows an investor to make their own luck. 

Rationality and Wealth

It seemed like a lot of people lost their minds in 2020. I wish more people would think like Charlie Munger when he says “I never allow myself to have an opinion on anything that I don’t know the other side’s argument better than they do”. Too many people fill their minds with toxic information, surround themselves with toxic people, and allow their cognitive biases to be exploited. An idea that I am developing is that you can’t build wealth (whether that is financial, or in mind/body/spirit) without rational thought. By rational, I mean thought based on first principles, facts, logic, reason, and removing your biases from the equation. You can get rich being irrational, but I think you will have a hard time building long term wealth without being rational. 

Discretionary Summary

Discretionary value is the label I’m giving to the positions that are fairly large (~5% of the portfolio) I believe are undervalued and may have the following characteristics: quality business, competitive advantage, misunderstood by the market, or a good company in a heavily sold off industry. The current discretionary value stocks I own consist of Capital One Financial (COF), Emerson Electric (EMR), Simon Property Group (SPG), and FirstEnergy (FE). The table below shows the cost basis, current value, and gains/losses for these positions.

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
COF63.253,478.755,436.7556.28%
EMR41.003,485.006,831.4596.02%
SPG74.503,427.003,922.8814.47%
FE28.003,500.003,826.259.32%

There has not been a lot of news to report with these stocks. Simon Property Group announced the acquisition of Taubman Centers (TCO), which should close early in 2021. This deal was supposed to happen early in 2020, but it was called off due to COVID19. At least now SPG will pay $43 a share for Taubman instead of the original $52.50. 

FirstEnergy drama has deepened this quarter with the firing of their CEO and a couple other executives for misconduct. The company hasn’t disclosed yet what this misconduct was. While FE is looking a little more guilty at the moment than when I made my purchase, the stock has not sold off. I will continue to monitor this company, hopefully the bad news is overblown and the stock will revert back to its pre-scandal levels once the investigation progresses. 

Tanker Stocks

Tankers have continued to be disappointing, despite their great profitability this year. Oil tanker spot rates went from a massive peak to a massive trough. Luckily most these companies have used their abnormal profits to shore up their balance sheet. Now that the tankers have to pay less interest on their debt, the break even spot rate is much lower.  Recently steel prices have had a large increase, which hopefully means people will be scraping their old tankers soon. One dollar increase in steel prices increases the scrap value of a VLCC by $40k.  Plus, less supply of tankers equals higher spot rates to ship the oil. 

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
DHT8.171,755.901,124.45-35.07%
FRO10.661,738.291,013.86-41.67%
STNG26.631,742.67760.92-56.34%
TNK23.861,765.88814.74-53.86%

Deep Value

Deep value is a sub-strategy I’m employing in my portfolio. This a quantitative strategy that buys a basket of statistically cheap stocks. The metric I use is EV/EBIT, based on the wonderful book The Acquirers Multiple. Historically, this strategy has provided excellent returns, although it has not kept up with the S&P 500 the past few years. Additionally, I am making an effort to apply this strategy to microcap companies. Microcaps are classified as having a market capitalization between $50M-300M. These small companies are more volatile, but have the potential for attractive returns.

My position sizing is smaller than the discretionary side of my portfolio because I want to own a basket of about 20 stocks. Since this is a quantitative strategy, I do not spend much time analyzing these businesses. The main idea is that these companies are trading at very cheap valuations, and the winners will (hopefully) outnumber the losers. 

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
BBSI50.501,767.502,387.3535.07%
FF13.001,794.001,752.60-2.31%
FRD5.101,800.102,421.5834.52%
HXL36.801,803.202,376.0131.77%
MUEL26.001,768.002,257.6027.69%
RELL4.451,802.251,907.555.84%
RSKIA8.251,740.752,126.8822.18%
SPRS1.311,819.303,074.7069.00%

401k and Precious Metals

My 401k is through my current employer and actively receives contributions. The 401k consists of a Blackrock Target Date Fund (which is no longer being funded), and the Oakmark Fund. The Oakmark Fund is a large cap value fund. Since I am actively contributing to my 401k, it will naturally have a growing influence on my portfolio. 

I also have a decent allocation to precious metals that are used as a bond substitute, recession and inflation hedge. The table below shows the YTD performance for the precious metals and 401k, which includes the effects of contributions.

12/31/1912/31/20YTD Gain (Loss)YTD Contributions
Precious Metals$7,861.00$9,964.0030.52%
401k$12,871.20$32,252.4314.59%$14,108.00

Tail Hedging

During October and November I implemented the hedging strategy that I had on early in the year. My initial position in October was buying $495 worth of SPY puts. In November, I sold the first batch of puts for $50, and bought another batch for $487. This second batch was sold in December for $175, and I haven’t bought any more since then. The net loss for this hedging was $757, or about 0.67% of the portfolio.

Books I’m Reading

The main book I read this quarter was The Philosophy Book: Big Ideas Simply Explained. Prior to this book, the only other philosophy work I have read was the classic Stoicism work “Meditations” by Marcus Aurelius. Whenever I would venture to Wikipedia to read about a philosophy concept, I would get bogged down by all the jargon. This book finally built the foundation for me to understand the high points of philosophy. In fact, I wish I would have read something like this a long time ago because I found the material extremely interesting. Not only does reading about philosophy feed my natural curiosity, but it applies to investing as well (maybe not the weird metaphysical concepts). Understanding why people do the things they do is very important to navigating the investment world. Maybe soon I’ll dig into a specific philosophical work like “On Liberty” by John Stuart Mills… 

Cable Cowboy: John Malone and the Rise of the Modern Cable Business is a book I received for Christmas and read within a few days. This book is about John Malone, and his career building TCI and Liberty Media. I was not familiar with Malone, but I knew he was renowned as a great capital allocator so I was looking forward to learning more about him. Malone took over as CEO of TCI in the early 70’s, and transformed the nearly bankrupt company to a cable giant. Once he sold off TCI, Malone has focused on Liberty Media, which he still controls today. Malone’s capital allocation is different from Buffett’s, he utilized debt and focused on cash flows over GAAP earnings. Reading this book makes me want to dig more into cable and media companies in the future. 

For more value investing content check out:

How Berkshire Acquired National Indemnity

Book Review: Buffettology

Intro to DCF Analysis Part 1

Q3 2020 Portfolio Update

This post contains affiliate links. If you use these links to buy something I may earn a commission. Thanks for your support.

Performance Overview

For Q3 2020, the portfolio is up 4.49% and is up 9% year to date. The Q3 starting balance was $89,241.80, and finished the quarter at $96,383.61. Contributions to the portfolio during the quarter amount to $3,135. 

No stocks were sold during this quarter, but nine new positions were added. The nine companies I have bought are Barrett Business Services (BBSI), Hexcel (HXL), Friedman Industries (FRD), George Risk Industries (RSKIA), Paul Mueller Co. (MUEL), Richardson Electronics (RELL), Surge Components (SPRS), FutureFuel (FF), and FirstEnergy (FE).

FirstEnergy is a sizable position, while the rest of the purchases were smaller allocations. FRD and RELL were net-nets (trading below net current asset value) at purchase. The rest of the smaller positions make up my foray into deep value investing, meaning they trade at very low EV/EBIT ratios. Many of these stocks are microcaps, meaning their market capitalization is below $300 million.

The current allocation of the portfolio is shown in the chart below. Currently, the portfolio  consists of discretionary value stocks, oil tankers, deep value, 401k stocks, precious metals, and cash. It can be seen that 69.8% of the portfolio is in stocks, while 30.2% is in cash and safe haven assets. I would prefer to deploy more of the cash to undervalued stocks, but I am remaining cautious despite the market surging during the third quarter.

During the quarter I received $318.08 total in dividends, which is broken down in the table below.

TickerQuarterly Dividend 
FF8.28
BBSI10.50
FRO81.50
STNG6.80
DHT103.20
EMR42.50
COF5.50
SPG59.80
Total318.08

My Thoughts

This quarter has been pretty drama free for my portfolio. The pandemic and economic difficulties have appeared to mellow out…but I wouldn’t be surprised if there is more trouble on the horizon. Despite my cautiousness, I did some buying this quarter. My goal of building out about 20 deep value positions started this quarter, with my purchase of eight companies. For the foreseeable future, I want to move towards an allocation of 70% stocks, 30% safe haven assets. I believe this will allow me to put some cash to work, while also having some ammo if the market corrects again. 

As for the market, it still appears irrational. Everyone and their plumber is making easy money in the market right now. Everything seems easy when the market keeps going up, but let’s not forget everyone freaking out in March. I strongly believe there is a difference between gambling speculation and investing (ok oil tankers are a speculation, but at least there’s a reasonable thesis behind it). I’m here trying to build wealth, not make quick gains. 

Also, the election is coming up, which I’m sure will be completely drama free…but if you think your portfolio is going to tank because the other guy won, well, you’re doing it wrong. As Buffett has said, don’t bet against America. Our businesses and country have been the place to be for 200 years. And if you’re that worried about a Great Depression 2.0, then you can always invest in a resiliant multi-asset portfolio.

Discretionary Summary

Discretionary value is the label I’m giving to the positions that are fairly large (~5% of the portfolio) I believe are undervalued and may have the following characteristics: quality business, competitive advantage, misunderstood by the market, or a good company in a heavily sold off industry. The current discretionary value stocks I own consist of Capital One Financial (COF), Emerson Electric (EMR), Simon Property Group (SPG), and FirstEnergy (FE). The table below shows the cost basis, current value, and gains/losses for these positions.

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
COF63.253,478.753,952.313.61%
EMR41.003,485.005373.4559.93%
SPG74.503,427.002975.28-13.18%
FE28.003,500.003,588.752.54%

FirstEnergy

FirstEnergy (FE) is an Ohio based electric utility company. FE services Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, New York and New Jersey. The reason FE is cheap is because it has been caught up in a bribery case involving Ohio Bill HB 6. FirstEnergy contributed to a political action committee to support this bill. This piece of legislation deals with the bankruptcy of FirstEnergy’s previously owned nuclear power plants.

These nuclear plants were spun off from FE a few years ago, into a new company called First Energy Solutions (now named Energy Harbor). FirstEnergy’s management separated from spin off three years before the HB 6 bill was proposed, and FirstEnergy Solutions went bankrupt a year before HB 6. FE management claims they did nothing wrong. Based on the info so far, it appears FE washed their hands of the nuclear plants years before the bill, and the legislation does not benefit FE that much. 

Part of my strategy is to find stocks that are heavily sold off from negative news. These situations can create opportunities because oftentimes the market becomes overly pessimistic on the stock. I believe FE has a good chance of coming away clean from these allegations, but I will monitor the situation in the coming quarters. 

This holding could either be a “value flip” or a longer term, bond substitute that will protect against inflation. Once this negative news gets settled, it is possible FirstEnergy will revert back to its pre-selloff price. I purchased FE at $28 at share, and it was trading around $45 a share before the negative headlines. While I wait for this reversion, I will get a safe 5.5% dividend yield and hopefully enjoy the low volatility typically associated with utilities. 

Tanker Stocks

Tankers have continued to be disappointing, despite their great profitability this year. I probably bought these stocks at the top, which is frustrating, but I’ll continue to push through the pain. Frontline and DHT have been rewarding shareholders with juicy dividends, so that somewhat alleviates the sting. The Twitter account @calvinfroedge has been a great resource for oil tanker investors, and he nicely sums up tankers so far this year: 

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
DHT8.171,755.901,109.40-36.82%
FRO10.661,738.291,059.50-39.05%
STNG26.631,742.67752.76-56.8%
TNK23.861,765.88802.16-54.57%

Deep Value

Deep value is a sub-strategy I’m employing in my portfolio. This a quantitative strategy that buys a basket of statistically cheap stocks. The metric I use is EV/EBIT, based on the wonderful book The Acquirers Multiple. Historically, this strategy has provided excellent returns, although it has not kept up with the S&P 500 the past few years. Additionally, I am making an effort to apply this strategy to microcap companies. Microcaps are classified as having a market capitalization between $50M-300M. These small companies are more volatile, but have the potential for attractive returns.

My position sizing is smaller than the discretionary side of my portfolio because I want to own a basket of about 20 stocks. Since this is a quantitative strategy, I do not spend much time analyzing these businesses. The main idea is that these companies are trading at very cheap valuations, and the winners will (hopefully) outnumber the losers. This quarter I added eight positions, which can be seen in the table.

Avg PriceCost BasisCurrent ValueCurrent Gain (Loss)
BBSI50.501,767.501835.403.84%
FF13.001794.001569.06-12.54%
FRD5.101800.101643.9513.74%
HXL36.801803.201643.95-8.83%
MUEL26.001768.001836.003.85%
RELL4.451802.251688.85-6.29%
RSKIA8.251740.752557.7029.70%
SPRS1.311819.301869.752.77%

401k and Precious Metals

My 401k is through my current employer and actively receives contributions. The 401k consists of a Blackrock Target Date Fund (which is no longer being funded), and the Oakmark Fund. The Oakmark Fund is a large cap value fund. Since I am actively contributing to my 401k, it will naturally have a growing influence on my portfolio. 

I also have a decent allocation to precious metals that are used as a bond substitute, recession and inflation hedge. The table below shows the YTD performance for the precious metals and 401k, which includes the effects of contributions.

12/31/199/30/20YTD Gain (Loss)YTD Contribution
Precious Metals$7,861.00$9,964.0026.75%
401k$10,962.24$23,687.3311.36%$10,863.00

Interesting Articles

If you think this post is boring, then  check these articles I read this quarter.

Monopolies are Distorting the Market

Buying Stocks Trading Above 10x Sales A Good Idea?

Books I’m Reading

A few weeks ago I went to the local used book store for the first time since the pandemic and found a copy of the classic Buffettology. This book contains a lot of info that Buffett die hards will have seen elsewhere. However, I think it is a great book for a newer investor to gain the right mindset about investing. One of the main points is thinking about a stock like owning a piece of a business, which is something I totally agree with. The book presents an interesting business valuation method. A gripe I have is that I think this method suffers from some hindsight bias, so I’m not sure how practical it is to use. 

Another book I read this quarter was Capital Allocation: The Financials of a New England Textile Mill 1955 – 1985. This book is the history of Berkshire Hathaway in the decade prior to Buffett taking control, and his capital allocation decisions up until the mid 80’s. Capital Allocation tells the story of how a struggling textile mill became one of the strongest companies in this country. My favorite part of this book is the deep dive into the financials of Berkshire and its early investments that I have not seen elsewhere. I loved nerding out over all of the financial statement snippets. Capital Allocation has a new place in my top 5 investing books. 

For more value investing fundamentals check out:

Q2 2020 Portfolio Update

Intro to DCF Analysis Part 1

Intro to DCF Analysis Part 2

The Many Flavors of Value Investing

The Many Flavors of Value Investing

One of my favorite things about value investing is that it is a broad church. A lot of people typically talk about value in generic terms, comparing value stocks to growth stocks. The reality is there are many strategies under the value investing umbrella.In this post, I’ll outline several of the main value investing strategies, give some examples, and discuss which ones I focus on. 

Growth at a Reasonable Price (GARP)

GARP investors try to balance buying high growth companies while still maintaining an anchor to business fundamentals. Companies like Tesla, Beyond Meat, Uber, pot stocks, tech companies, are growing their sales at very high rates. Oftentimes, the narrative of their growth is driving the stock price to valuations that would imply unrealistic growth.  Additionally many of these companies are not profitable. GARP investors would find high growth stocks that still had a profitable business trading at a reasonable price. 

One of the main metrics used to find GARP stocks is the Price to Earnings Growth ratio (PEG). The PEG ratio was made popular by the famous fund manager Peter Lynch. Examples of GARP stocks are Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), and Lowe’s (LOW). I don’t utilize this strategy in my investing since I typically focus on more modest growth, and more emphasis on being undervalued.

Quality

Warren Buffet says to “buy great companies at fair prices”, which is the definition of this value strategy. Quality stocks have strong brand names, competitive advantages, constantly growing profits, little debt, high returns on equity, low growth. These are companies like Coca-Cola (KO), Procter & Gamble (PG), and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). It makes sense to want to invest in high quality stocks, however these companies are typically very expensive. With their predictable earnings, and often recession proof businesses, they are almost treated like bonds. ETFs such as QUAL contain these types of companies, but they appear overvalued for my liking. I would love to own a handful of quality companies at a good price. In reality, the only time you can find remotely cheap quality companies is during a market panic.  

Compounders

Compounders are quality businesses with competitive advantages, good return on equity, and modest to high growth. The idea is that these companies will continue reinvesting earnings into their business in order to compound at attractive rates for 10 years or more. In many ways these are similar to GARP and quality stocks. Compounders will have high return on equity and consistently growing earnings. Finding an attractively priced compounder is an investors dream, but difficult to do so in a bull market. 

This value investing strategy gets a bad rap from “Compounder Bro’s”. These investors buy companies like TransDigm (TDG), Roper Technologies (ROP), or software-as-a-service (SaaS) stocks, which are great businesses. Compounder Bro’s stereotypically over pay for these stocks, or may have over-optimistic projections of future growth. Additionally, Compounder Bro’s brag about how great their stock picks have done since these types of companies have greatly outperformed typical value stocks lately.  

Traditional Value

What I consider traditional value stocks are good or decent companies that are temporarily undervalued. Reasons for their cheapness could be bad news, law suits, sector headwinds, being misunderstood, or the business is out of favor. Usually if the financial media is saying a sector or business is “dead”, then it’s time to sift through the depressed industry and find any hidden gems. These types of stocks are one of my main areas of focus. I typically look for solid businesses with low debt, then try to understand the narrative and decide if the consensus is overreacting.  

In my current portfolio, Capital One, Emerson Electric, and Simon Property Group fall into this category. Emerson was simply sold off because of the dramatic March sell off. Capital One has to navigate this low rate environment, which means it’s cheap along with a bunch of other financial stocks. SPG has high quality malls in major metros which I think will do fine, while crappy malls in crappy cities will die. 

Another example is in 2017, when all the headlines were saying Amazon is killing retail. Sure, Amazon will destroy companies like Sears and JC Penny who sell undifferentiated products. But retailers like Tractor Supply and Williams-Sonoma got caught up in the industry selloff. I thought these businesses were higher quality, niche retailers that would not immediately be impacted by Amazon. These companies had strong fundamentals but were selling at a discount. I bought both of these companies and sold them a year later for a 40-50% gain.

Quantitative Value

This strategy involves buying a basket of statistically cheap stocks. Out of this basket, some of the stocks will do poorly but hopefully a subset mean-revert to a typical valuation. The valuation metrics used to screen for these stocks could be price-to-book value (P/B), price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to- free cash flow (P/FCF), enterprise value over earnings before interest and tax (EV/EBIT) among others. 

Buying low P/B stocks is a classic implementation, is often used in academic value investing papers, and often is used in value indices. Supposedly accounting standards don’t accurately account for book value with tech companies, or businesses with a great brand name. P/B seems to work better for financials or old economy businesses with little R&D or other intangible assets. Given these apparent limitations, I do not screen specifically for low P/B stocks.I like looking at P/FCF in general as a shortcut valuation, however I don’t screen strictly for low P/FCF stocks. 

Deep Value

Deep value falls under the quantitative value strategy. The book “Deep Value” by Tobias Carlisle wonderfully discusses this strategy. I wanted to particularly highlight this strategy since I am interested in implementing it in my portfolio. This metric is also known as the acquirer’s multiple because instead of using the stocks market cap (the price), it uses enterprise value. 

Enterprise value is the market cap of the equity, plus any outstanding debt, minus cash on the balance sheet. This reflects the price someone would have to pay to buy the entire business since they would have to retire the debt and could use the cash to offset the purchase price. EBIT is basically operating income, which is higher up the income statement than net income (earnings). Net income takes into account a companies interest payment on debt, but this metric factors in debt with the enterprise value. 

Studies have shown that EV/EBIT is one of the most robust quantitative valuation metrics. This strategy has historically outperformed the S&P 500. Lately all quant value strategies have underperformed, with value investing in general having a hard time keeping up with the frothy market. I plan on incorporating the acquirers multiple strategy in my portfolio because of its long term track record of outperforming. Another reason I am drawn to this strategy is because it can be rare to find quality stocks at cheap valuations. Low EV/EBIT stocks can fill up my portfolio until opportunity arises. 

Asset Plays

Asset plays are similar to buying low P/B stocks, but with a twist. The difference between asset plays, and simply buying cheap P/B stocks, is that the value of the company is based on a physical asset. Occasionally an investor can buy into these assets at attractive prices. If you really dig for treasure, you can find companies where the assets are under reported on the balance sheet, which creates value. An example would be a Maui Land and Pineapple (MLP), that has real estate recorded on its books at the price paid decades ago. Of course Maui real estate has greatly appreciated, but this value is not showing up in the accounting. Another example could be a timber company, or quarry, that owns natural resources. Additionally, these hard assets will probably do well during inflationary periods. 

Net-Nets

This is the original value investing strategy devised by Benjamin Graham. While there are a couple of ways to implement this strategy, the most common is to buy companies that are trading below their net current asset value. Current assets are things such as cash, inventory, and accounts receivables. Current liabilities consists of short term debt coming due, and account payables. The net current asset value is arrived by subtracting the current liabilities from the current assets. When the market cap of a stock is below this figure, it is really freaking cheap. You are paying less than the cash on hand and the inventories of the business. 

Warren Buffett cut his teeth on net-nets back in the 1950’s, helping him create a great early track record. The problem with net-nets is that everyone knows they are awesome, so it is very rare to find any. Right now there are only a few net-nets that may be worth buying. However, during big market selloffs, net-nets make a reappearance. Finding a handful of net-nets is something I am always on the lookout for. 

Special Situations

Special situations, or “work outs” as Buffett called them back in the day, are corporate spinoffs, mergers, or emerging bankruptcies. I think this is one of the coolest value investing strategies. The unfortunately titled book “You Can Be a Stock Market Genius”, by Joel Greenblatt, explains special situations in great detail. 

Occasionally companies spinoff operations into a new company in order to simplify the core business, among other reasons. Institutional investors are typically more interested in the parent company, so they indiscriminately sell off their shares of the spinoff. This selling can create tremendous value. Companies emerging from bankruptcy (not going into it like Hertz) can be dirt cheap, and ridden of their burdensome debt. These stocks, under the right circumstances, can provide great returns. I would love to invest more into special situations, however it is time consuming to research these opportunities. 

Conclusion

There are probably a few variations of value investing that I missed, but the strategies outlined here are the most commonly discussed. I personally utilize a blend of value strategies. The most desired types of value stocks are probably cheap, quality stocks, and net-nets. In the meantime, I will continue searching for good companies that are misunderstood and share more reliable value investing strategies. Finally, I will use quantitative deep value to round out the portfolio. 

Check out my other posts on the fundamentals of value investing:

What Is Value Investing Anyway?

Intro to Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, Part 1